truthaction.org Forum Index truthaction.org
9/11 TRUTH NOW
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kevin Barrett promoting disinfo
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 37, 38, 39  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be fair, Barrett didn't say he wanted Israel wiped out... he did say that he wants the state of Israel dismantled...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John Bursill



Joined: 07 Apr 2007
Posts: 393
Location: Sydney Australia

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jon that link is now broken?

It was working?

Strange...sounded very interesting!

Regards John
_________________
WE GOT TO TAKE THE POWER BACK!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try this...

http://noliesradio.org/archives/FB20090915__Steve%20Alten_web.mp3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truebeleaguer



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Big Three in internet news and commentary, Barrett says, are Rense and WhatReallyHappened and Alex Jones.

http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2009/09/my-interview-on-what-really-happened.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2009/09/walid-shoebats-evil-twin-we-jews-want.html

"Jewish terrorist" [...] "I grew up in the part of Palestine that is occupied by Jewish terrorists" [...] "Growing up as a secret Jewish terrorist" [...] "As a teenager I was selected for membership in the elite Jewish terrorist group the Elders of Zion" [...] "my years as a Jewish terrorist" [...] "Jewish terrorist" [...] "Fox, MSNBC, and the other mainstream media outlets run by Zionists and/or military contractors" [..] "how evil the Jews are" [...] "once the Jews take over the world"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I address "terrorists," I do it exactly as that. "terrorists..." in quotes... because it's hard to know who is a legitimate "terrorist" and who is being manipulated by different intelligence agencies around the world. However, I never say "Muslim Terrorist." Barrett is a racist through and through.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And "Al-Qaeda" is whatever our Government needs it to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dicktater



Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 698
Location: Lower Slobovia

PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jon Gold wrote:
... because it's hard to know who is a legitimate "terrorist" and who is being manipulated by different intelligence agencies around the world


That's because there is no difference. The only real terrorists wear Darth Vader outfits (both all black and the seasonal and stylish tan and sand) and blissfully follow orders given by absolutely eVil fucking creatures masquerading as public servants.

How does this definition from 1942 comport with more a recently published dictionary?



Governments are the only real fucking terrorists in every sense of the word. Take back our vocabulary and stop letting them use it against us.

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
-- H. L. Mencken
_________________
In a dictatorship, no one can hear you scream.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also put "terrorists" in quotes because as I wrote a long time ago...

"First of all, Iraq and the people fighting against Americans in Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Bush himself, admitted that the country of Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. As for the groups of people fighting our brave soldiers... If America was invaded by Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, North Korea, Russia, or China, like America invaded Iraq, would Americans that actively opposed said invasion be an "extremist movement" or would they be patriots defending their country? I guess that depends on whether or not you are the invader or the invadees."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rancho Truth



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 331
Location: Washington, DC

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barrett first reported this 'rumor' (APFN has not updated their archive of it, as of now):
disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=126830;
"Pepper also confirmed the rumor that a professor who is an expert on election law refused to help NYCcan.org after Pepper was unable to promise the professor that the results of a genuine 9/11 investigation would not hurt Israel."

Anyone heard this 'rumor', or know how it got started?

Barrett did update his blog entry, and thanks Ted Walter correcting him:
truthjihad.blogspot.com/2009/10/william-pepper-explains-why-911-ballot.html
"Pepper also confirmed the rumor that a professor who is an expert on election law, when asked to help NYCcan.org, asked Pepper to promise him that the results of a genuine 9/11 investigation would not hurt Israel. Pepper naturally said he could not promise what might come of an investigation. Contrary to my earlier erroneous report, the professor did NOT refuse to help NYCcan.org. A thank-you to Ted Walter for correcting this."

However, it's troubling that Barrett is still claiming the above on his blog; from listening to the audio, it's clear that Pepper did not say he was asked to promise anything, or said he could not- this is my transcript of that part, which starts at 9": noliesradio.org/archives/7193

Kevin Barrett- "By the way, can you- feel free to not answer this, if you don't want to, but can you confirm or deny a rumor that a leading Constitutional scholar refused to help NYCCAN.org when he asked- said 'Promise me that this will not hurt Israel', and you couldn't promise him that?

William Pepper- "He's not a Constitutional scholar- at all- he is an election law specialist. The election laws in any jurisdiction tend to require a good deal of very particular experience... and knowledge. As this was a particular election- I won't name him, but there was a particular election lawyer who is a specialist in this area, and, yes, he did raise the issue of- he did specifically raise the issue of Israel, and whether or not the Israeli activists or operatives were in any way going to be brought into the limelight because of 9/11. (chuckles) So I guess- I was amused with the query, and I said, 'Why are you asking me that- do you know something that I don't know?'"

KB- "Well, some people say that everybody knows there was an Israeli angle to 9/11, and it's the worst kept secret out there, but- a lot of people are worried about that."

WP- "Anyway, that was the nature of that conversation, yes."
_________________
http://911reports.com/
http://www.historycommons.org


Last edited by Rancho Truth on Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:02 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I said on blogger...

What is "anti-semitic" is making up stories [...] just to create a narrative that involves Israel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truebeleaguer



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barrett's treasonous "Support the Taliban" post of 10/20 http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2009/10/should-american-patriots-support.html links an article alleging that Jews control the media. http://theunjustmedia.com/Media/Six%20Jewish%20Companies%20Control%2096%25%20of%20the%20World%E2%80%99s%20Media.htm

In the first six paragraphs (it's a 19 paragraph article) it lists eight of these Jews. The following list gives the dates that they left the positions the article claims that they occupy.

Michael Eisner, 2005
Gerald Levin, 2002.
Danny Goldberg 1995
Normal Pearlstine 2005
Sherry Lansing 2004
Peter Chernin, 2009 (not "Chermin")
Michael Schulhof, 1995
Ronald Perelman, 1997

Barrett told Noam Chomsky that he lost a tenure track position. He never had a tenure track position to lose. He's a complete clown.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why American patriots should support the Taliban...

Wow. That really helps us doesn't it? Wow. I'm going to tattoo "terrorist sympathizer" on my arm.

It's obvious at this point that Kevin Barrett is a detriment to the 9/11 Truth cause. He should not be promoted by anyone. Ever.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It's obvious at this point that Kevin Barrett is a detriment to the 9/11 Truth cause. He should not be promoted by anyone. Ever.


Except: ROBERT BOWMAN, CAROL BROUILLET, DAVID RAY GRIFFIN and KEVIN RYAN, all of whom very openly endorsed his recent run for congress.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
truebeleaguer



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

truthmover, I suspect they endorsed him because they had communicated with him and feared he might be suicidal.

Jon, it's been obvious to me that Kevin was an embarrassment to our cause ever since he Jew-baited Mark Robinowitz by expressing support for holocaust denial. It's clear he makes a practice of going around alienating potential allies.

IMHO he's hurting not only the cause of 9/11 Truth but the causes of Anti-Zionism, the Palestinian people's quest for justice, and the Muslim cause in general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 37, 38, 39  Next
Page 25 of 39

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group