truthaction.org Forum Index truthaction.org
9/11 TRUTH NOW
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2008 Declaration: Standards and Strategies for 9/11 Truth
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
truthmove



Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:49 am    Post subject: 2008 Declaration: Standards and Strategies for 9/11 Truth Reply with quote

Hello Truth Action people! We are finally announcing the Declaration concerning disinformation, disruption, and movement responsibility...

After months of cooperative effort, we are proud to announce "The 2008 Declaration: Standards and Strategies for 9/11 Truth." Many truth movement veterans came together after the 9/11/07 anniversary with concerns over the increasing influence of disinformation, disruption, partisanship, and irresponsible representation within the movement. This document is our response.

As we state clearly in the Declaration, we simply aim it to be a guide for others, not a divisive list of commandments. It's the best we could come up with, we hope it does some good.

The authors and supporters listed are not the only ones who participated in the creation of this Declaration. Some names may be added or removed as per individual request. We invite everyone who so wishes, to host or link to the Declaration.

Comments and questions are welcome on the TruthMove Forum, or post them here, of course.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
funhouse1970



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 339

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Almost.

Your "list of associations that are damaging and marginalizing to the movement" includes:

"Anti-environmentalism (i.e. “global warming is a hoax” or “the environment is fine; humans aren’t causing significant damage”)"

Anti-environmentalism is a misnomer. The argument is misrepresented -- should read "manmade global warming is a hoax."

Otherwise it looks good. My two cents.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Real Truther



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 230
Location: Northeast US

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

truthmove, this is a transparent attempt at top-down management by someone who wants to control the movement. guess what? it stands rejected. neither you nor anyone else has any authority or even credibility with regard to this movement. the people you call veteran truthers have proven themselves, like Nicholas Levis for example, to be limited hangout LIHOP shills. All the so-called disinfo you complain about is "false flag" stuff designed to make the shills look good. Good luck with the campaign, you'll need it and then some.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Real Truther wrote:
truthmove, this is a transparent attempt at top-down management by someone who wants to control the movement. guess what? it stands rejected. neither you nor anyone else has any authority or even credibility with regard to this movement. the people you call veteran truthers have proven themselves, like Nicholas Levis for example, to be limited hangout LIHOP shills. All the so-called disinfo you complain about is "false flag" stuff designed to make the shills look good. Good luck with the campaign, you'll need it and then some.


It's not a campaign. It's simply a series of suggestions that you can either incorporate into your activism, or not. Why the need to refer to Nick Levis as a "limited hangout LIHOP shill?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Real Truther



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 230
Location: Northeast US

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hey look who's here! it's Jon Gold!! He's like the most famousest truther ever! Does SUCH great work with the families, and promoting Sibel Edmonds...

whodathunk he'd show up to defend the other LIHOP limited hangout shills!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Real Truther wrote:
hey look who's here! it's Jon Gold!! He's like the most famousest truther ever! Does SUCH great work with the families, and promoting Sibel Edmonds...

whodathunk he'd show up to defend the other LIHOP limited hangout shills!


Wow, you've really gone off the deep end. What's it like in your world? Is the sky blue?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Real Truther



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 230
Location: Northeast US

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ha! Naw, Jon. To quote your pal John Albanese (LIHOP legend that he was) I'm just taking things to the next level. I'm calling you and the others on your BS. Are you still not sure if WTC7 was a controlled demolition Jon? It's so hard to tell whether you're being dishonest when you claim to believe stupid shit... Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Real Truther wrote:
Ha! Naw, Jon. To quote your pal John Albanese (LIHOP legend that he was) I'm just taking things to the next level. I'm calling you and the others on your BS. Are you still not sure if WTC7 was a controlled demolition Jon? It's so hard to tell whether you're being dishonest when you claim to believe stupid shit... Smile


Believing whether or not Controlled Demolition took place at the WTC is not a pre-requisite for being a member of the 9/11 Truth Movement last I checked. Only in your world. What color is that sky again?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Real Truther



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 230
Location: Northeast US

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ha! Are you actually ashamed to flat out say you don't Jon? That's hilarious. No, you're right, the standards for being considered a valuable member of the truth movement by you are obviously not all that high... Say hi to Lucky Larry for us all in demolition land!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Real Truther wrote:
Ha! Are you actually ashamed to flat out say you don't Jon? That's hilarious. No, you're right, the standards for being considered a valuable member of the truth movement by you are obviously not all that high... Say hi to Lucky Larry for us all in demolition land!


Will do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
big_d



Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jon Gold wrote:
Believing whether or not Controlled Demolition took place at the WTC is not a pre-requisite for being a member of the 9/11 Truth Movement last I checked.


No, but denying reality all while pushing the limited hang-out agenda sure sets off a few alarms.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon Gold



Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 1102

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Real Truther wrote:
Come on, Jonny, explain why you don't think the towers were demolished with explosives. In other words, justify your claim to believing in utter BS. What is your obsession anyway with villifying muslims? Haven't they been lied about enough? Haven't enough of them died for you to be happy yet? If you can't explain why you don't think the twoers were demolished with explosives, can you at least clue us in to why you're such an anti-arab and anti-muslim bigot?


Some of us know better than to think of those that may have participated in the attacks as Muslims, Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Episcopalians, Baptists, etc...

We prefer to think of them as criminals. It was, after all, a criminal conspiracy. Not a Zionist conspiracy. Not a Neocon conspiracy. Not a Radical Islamofascist conspiracy. A criminal conspiracy. A crime was committed. And we know that if any of the criminals involved were affiliated with any of the above mentioned religions, that does not mean you should automatically blame everyone else that is a part of said religion. The same goes for nationality and country.

As Donna Marsh O'Connor so eloquently said in front of the United Nations, "Is one Arab the same as all Arabs? How dare that work in America!"

It doesn't or shouldn't work that way in the America I'm a part of. You must be thinking of the America in your world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Col. Jenny Sparks



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 2329

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jon Gold wrote:
Episcopalians


Oh no! Not the Episcopalians! Laughing
_________________
___________________________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:10 am    Post subject: RT violates the guidelines of this forum on a regular basis. Reply with quote

RT wrote elsewhere:

Quote:
The best policy is of course to allow all topics but to strictly enforce a code of civil dialogue.


RT wrote here:

Quote:
Truthmove, this is a transparent attempt at top-down management by someone who wants to control the movement. guess what? it stands rejected.


That is inaccurate and also self-contradictory. In this comment it is you who is attempting to speak for others. Since when do you speak for everyone here?

RT wrote here:

Quote:
The people you call veteran truthers have proven themselves, like Nicholas Levis for example, to be limited hangout LIHOP shills.


YT wrote elsewhere regarding a post of yours:
Quote:

The above post is a solid example of what I don't want here. Implying that someone is a spy or a shill, attacking them for their post count, etc. Posts like that will be copied, removed and sent to the author along with a warning. Second offense gets an account suspension.


These comments of yours violate the recommended forum guidelines here, and it sounds like you are on shaky ground here with the moderators. Not everyone who participated in the creation of this document is listed, and you are insulting people who have demonstrated a strong commitment to this movement.

And from a logical standpoint, you are pushing logical fallacies. Attacking the messenger isn't going to win you any points. According to the declaration, I will now continue to ignore you as I have for so long.

Edit: It appears that RT has had his account deactivated. I can certainly see why.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Adam1



Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Posts: 144

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:18 am    Post subject: Re: RT violates the guidelines of this forum on a regular ba Reply with quote

truthmover wrote:
It appears that RT has had his account deactivated. I can certainly see why.




http://www.memorialspaceflights.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group