truthaction.org

[truthmover]

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/critical-review-of-pentacon-smoking-gun.html

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/11/cit-craig-ranke-aldo-marquis-and.html
_________________
http://911truthburnout.blogspot.com

[Craig Ranke CIT]

I'd like to reiterate how in my first response in this thread I asked johndoraemi,

"Have you viewed/heard the first-hand accounts from all 13 north side witnesses as well as the first critical flyover witness Roosevelt Roberts Jr?"


I also asked this of Arabesque and neither have stated that they have viewed the evidence but I believe that johndoraemi has stated that he has NOT viewed the evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong fellas.

Perhaps you viewed it tonight.

[truthmover]

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/05/critical-review-of-pentacon-smoking-gun.html

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/11/cit-craig-ranke-aldo-marquis-and.html
_________________
http://911truthburnout.blogspot.com

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Too bad the links you are spamming do not even address the new evidence presented.

Part 1:
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=I0AHWVAJ

Part 2:
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=9MXES2NS


Why is it so hard to communicate like an adult about the evidence?

Sticking your thumbs in your ears while avoiding the evidence and spamming irrelevant links is not a very intellectual or mature way to respond.

[JohnA]

ummmm.... it does appear that the evidence you present HAS been reviewed, debated and fully addressed.

it also appears that the verdict is unanimous.

so now we are faced with the hard choice of trying to decide if your behavior begins to cross the line of being intentionally disruptive and intentionally intellectually dishonest.

You were very graciously allowed to present your case here. Unfortunately, your theories appear to have been unanimously rejected. This does not now entitle you to strain the hospitality of those who gave you this forum to present.

The choice is yours. Continue to whip this dead horse while levying insults at those whom you have failed to persuade - or simply accept the results and reevalute the situation.

Let us be clear. All to often we have seen disruptors wrap themselves in phony theories as a way of ingratiating themselves onto message boards that they ultimately disrupt - intentionally.

No one (yet) is passing this judgment on you. But - you DO appear to be straining your welcome.

Good day to you!

[johndoraemi]

"I also asked this of Arabesque and neither have stated that they have viewed the evidence but I believe that johndoraemi has stated that he has NOT viewed the evidence."

I saw your original presentation. I saw the alleged Roosevelt Roberts interview (nothing actually established that the guy on the other end of the phone was actually Roosevelt Roberts, btw).

I've been far more open to your theories than others here, refusing to flat out call it disinformation, but allowing for the possibility of course.

Now, you have a witness that you need to refute, the guy flying the C130 who was tasked by flight controllers to follow the rogue plane.

“Looks like that aircraft crashed into the Pentagon, sir.”

He was above the scene, and in perfect position to see if the plane continued on. You'll probably just say he's lying too. Okay.

So we have conflicting stories. Neither of them proven. The lack of witness corroboration of a plane LEAVING THE CRASH SITE shoots your theory down in flames.

You allegedly have one guy with a highly implausible story. No photographic or radar evidence. No flight controllers, no highway witnesses. No one else at all.

Admit you have "proven" nothing. Check mate.
_________________
The Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

[Craig Ranke CIT]

[johndoraemi]

"...scientifically validated evidence that contradicts the official story?"

People talking for your camcorder is NOT "scientifically validated evidence."

That is all you have, all you ever had. Give me a break. Your broken record automaton approach has failed. You claims don't match your "evidence."

Enough.
_________________
The Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

[truthmover]