truthaction.org Forum Index truthaction.org
9/11 TRUTH NOW
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

"Transparency" vs. "Change" Conference
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:19 am    Post subject: "Transparency" vs. "Change" Conference Reply with quote

It's official. We now, yet again, have two anniversary events scheduled for NYC this year.

Real Change Conference
http://www.wearechange.org/91109/

We Demand Transparency
http://changeandtransparency.blogspot.com/

As I suggested on my blog Sander Hicks had tried to facilitate cooperation between Luke and Les. In the process their previous problems with one another were scrubbed from the internet. You can still find that episode of the movement's history archived here:

Original WeAreChange "Declaration of NY911Truth" - Jamieson v Rudkowki scrubbed
http://www.truthmove.org/forum/topic/1590?replies=10

That cooperation appears to have been tenuous and broke down resulting in two separate events. And these events are very different.

That ends the journalistic part of this post. The rest is my opinion based on my movement experience and personal exposure to those involved.

While I have my differences with WAC and Luke, the Real Change Conference is BY FAR the more credible of the two events.

I nearly jumped out of my chair this evening coming home from a night out for a few drinks with friends to find that not only were Barrett and CIT still on the list but both Cindy Sheehan and Steve Alten had been added to the list of those participating in the We Demand Transparency event.

For a review of critical opinions of Steve Alten and The Shell Game have a look at this thread:
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3309&highlight=alten

In my personal opinion, certainly shared by others, but totally disputed by many, Steve Alten is nothing but trouble. He seems to have added 9/11 facts in between the chapters of his book after writing it simply to capitalize on this movement. He has demonstrated no interest in this movement beyond it's ability to sell copies of his book. And I feel that many in the movement foolishly jumped at the opportunity to take advantage of the possibility that he might bring us some attention. That didn't happen. And his book was crap.

Barrett, Ranke, and Alten. Three people who I believe have done more harm than good for this movement. And all of this coordinated by Les Jamieson, responsible for the "Ready for Mainstream" conference in which Tarpley stated that regular posters to this forum including Cosmos were cointelpro agents.

There has never been anyone I've ever met in my life I trust less than Les Jamieson. His actions consistently serve to undermine the movement. I think we have due cause for concern that this conference, like the "Ready for Mainstream" conference, may do a good deal of damage. And that includes possibly dragging some really cool people through the mud.

Daniel Sunjata and Cindy Sheehan specifically. Cindy Sheehan is actually going to participate in an event with someone who sided against her in the Kennebunkport Warning. Barrett stood behind Fetzer and Tarpley who claimed that Sheehan was lying about having signed a different document.

And Daniel Sunjata is just a really cool and brave guy who has risked his career to support our cause and deserves the highest respect we can muster. Putting him on stage with Barrett and Alten is really upsetting to me.

Now, I'll admit that this event might not go so badly. If everyone minds their manners, it might end up working out alright and not doing any major damage other than promoting Barrett, Alten, and CIT. But the "Ready for Mainstream" conference did. We simply can't ignore precedent.

And also, I think it's important to note that it does the movement little good having competing events for the anniversary in NYC. I appreciate that the WAC event includes not one controversial speaker. They even got rid of Deagle.

As a result I would highly recommend two things. First that people in NYC attend the WAC event and not the Jamieson event. And second, that people who share any of my concerns make them know to the events organizers. Don't try to contact Les. He is famous for avoiding critique and being unresponsive. Contact Hicks. Let him know what you think of this big tent nightmare that he is helping to coordinate.

Well, I know that many may not many agree with me. But I had to say my piece. Here's hoping for the best. And I mean that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
zombie bill hicks



Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 411
Location: West Virginia

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks J, Im glad you started this thread. Maybe its possible that someone could contact Sheehan and Sunjata, bring them up to speed on this situation, and get them to agree to attend the WAC event instead. As a bonus, this might even derail the momentum of Jamiesons event, which IMO, would be a healthy result.


EDIT: Browsing WACs event website, I noticed it now lists Daniel Sunjata as a presenter. Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
President Ford



Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 600
Location: Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps having 2 events does serve us well. Especially if it can be continuously pointed out that one group has HUGE credibility issues over the other. After all, none of these people are going to go away. And, this situation is a pretty good illustration of how the movement is divided.

People who are not yet in the movement, they need to understand that we are not one big happy family. It doesn't work that way. People, in large part, have decent filters if they are given the facts. They can see the bullshitters as long as they are open to the fact that the bullshitters are lying to them. To be well-educated on 9/11, one must be familiar with disinformation and disinformation tactics. Then, everyone's true colors are exposed. People must learn that it isn't all so black and white and CRITICAL THINKING is the only way to decide for yourself what happened on 9/11.

In other words, maybe it is good to have them all in one place for a change. We need hundreds more posts like this one to keep pointing out the liars.

That said, we must try to reach out to Daniel and Cindy, and whoever else might get caught up in the crossfire. These two people are courageous individuals who deserve to have their backs covered on this. Especially Cindy, who was burned by Les, Webster Tarpley and Kevin Barrett over the Kennebunkport Warning, which is a vital story for every Truth Activist to be up on because it shows who the fake truthers are, and who will probably be attending Les' event.

See here, here, and here
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I posted an update to the Burnout blog largely based on this thread.

http://911truthburnout.blogspot.com/2009/07/we-demand-transparency-conference-big.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
truebeleaguer



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course the appearances by Dr. Barrett and CIT provide a leafletting opportunity. Arabesque's list of Barrett quotes is damning all by itself.
I'd add to the list the opening to his email to Chomsky:

"As one of three American scholars to have lost a tenured or tenure-track job due to questioning the official story of 9/11 (the other two are Steven Jones, who just co-published a paper in a peer-reviewed engineering journal on the case, and Judy Wood) I would appreciate the chance to discuss this and other issues with you on one of my three talk radio shows."

This is a blatant lie. Barrett was a part time lecturer. That's not tenure-track. No one would ever even think about offering him a lifetime license for his assholery.

CIT's nonsense is easily taken apart. Roosevelt Roberts' impossible tale is the keystone of their tale, and simply abstracting it is enough to sink CIT. A half-page leaflet with Barrett on one side and CIT on the other would do it.

More effective than boycotting them might be to walk out on them, badmouthing their bullshit the whole way. Their presence could be a blessing, an opportunity to show the media what real truthers think of bullshitters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"We Demand Transparency" current speaker list.

Daniel Sunjata
Eric Lawyer
Kevin Barrett
Barry Kissin
Barrie Zwicker
Steve Alten
Richard Gage
Craig Ranke
Daniel Hopsicker
Mike Berger
Jason Bermas
Ellen Brown
William Bergman
Robert Steele
William Pepper
Manny Badillo
Bob McIlvaine

PLUS DJ Green Arrow will be present, at St. Marks Church, throughout the conference, attempting to set a new Guinness World's Record for longest free-style rap. Proceeds to benefit NYC CAN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
YT



Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 4601
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

truthmover wrote:
DJ Green Arrow


Green Lantern!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Arabesque



Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 1437

PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

truebeleaguer wrote:
Of course the appearances by Dr. Barrett and CIT provide a leafletting opportunity. Arabesque's list of Barrett quotes is damning all by itself.
I'd add to the list the opening to his email to Chomsky:

"As one of three American scholars to have lost a tenured or tenure-track job due to questioning the official story of 9/11 (the other two are Steven Jones, who just co-published a paper in a peer-reviewed engineering journal on the case, and Judy Wood) I would appreciate the chance to discuss this and other issues with you on one of my three talk radio shows."

This is a blatant lie. Barrett was a part time lecturer. That's not tenure-track. No one would ever even think about offering him a lifetime license for his assholery.

CIT's nonsense is easily taken apart. Roosevelt Roberts' impossible tale is the keystone of their tale, and simply abstracting it is enough to sink CIT. A half-page leaflet with Barrett on one side and CIT on the other would do it.

More effective than boycotting them might be to walk out on them, badmouthing their bullshit the whole way. Their presence could be a blessing, an opportunity to show the media what real truthers think of bullshitters.


Thanks, man. I also recommend one of my latest posts on CIT* here:

William Lagasse: "These poles were not knocked down" CIT: "He didn't see the light poles"
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2009/07/william-lagasse-these-poles-were-not.html

Quote:
# CIT claims that Lagasse, a witness who misplaced the location of the light poles, taxi cab, and even his own location is "smoking gun" proof
# CIT insinuate that the witness "did not see the light poles" when confronted with the fact that the witness misplaced the location of the light poles
# CIT claims that the fact that the witness got the location of the light poles wrong "only serves to prove how certain he is of where he saw the plane."
# CIT and their supporters confuse and obfuscate Lagasse's testimony that "plane did not hit the light poles" with his statement that he "saw the light poles [on the ground]"
# CIT misleadingly claim that Lagasse could "not" have seen the plane on the "south" side of the station because "[Lagasse] would not be able to see the plane through the building at all," when in reality, the CITGO gas station does not completely obstruct the view "at all".


*Disclaimer: By using the word CIT I am not endorsing wholesale spamming and sock-puppeteering of the truth action forum with CIT propaganda. By posting the above word, I am not endorsing another 20 page discussion of CIT and their "research", which I will not take a part of. I will not "debate" individuals who blatantly distort my own words, make things up, claim that witnesses who get basic information wrong make their testimony "more reliable" [seriously, WTF?], etc. Any other ridiculous attempts to completely waste my time will be utterly ignored. Have a nice day.
_________________
Arabesque: 911 Truth
2008 Declaration: Standards and Strategies for 9/11 Truth
A 9/11/2008 Resolution: Start Your Own 9/11 Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Col. Jenny Sparks



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 2329

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

truthmover wrote:
"We Demand Transparency" current speaker list.

Daniel Sunjata
Eric Lawyer
Kevin Barrett
Barry Kissin
Barrie Zwicker
Steve Alten
Richard Gage
Craig Ranke
Daniel Hopsicker
Mike Berger
Jason Bermas
Ellen Brown
William Bergman
Robert Steele
William Pepper
Manny Badillo
Bob McIlvaine

PLUS DJ Green Arrow will be present, at St. Marks Church, throughout the conference, attempting to set a new Guinness World's Record for longest free-style rap. Proceeds to benefit NYC CAN.


God, I hope no one is allowing Barrett --and therefore Fetzer>Killtown>WQ2RX weirdo stalkers--access to personal or financial information. It's not like there haven't been enough warnings---

http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/05/mark-humphrey-is-not-harley-guy.html

Mr. Alten in particular should pay attention--

http://forum.911movement. org/index.php?showtopic=2722

If you are reading Mr. Alten, Kevin Barrett knows the people who attacked you at that forum. He's interviewed the site owner on radio. He know exactly who they are. So if you asked him and he said he didn't he lied. For the love of all that is holy, someone get a clue.

I will be loudly saying I told you so if the attacks from the Barrett/Fetzer quarter rev up again.


_________________
___________________________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Col. Jenny Sparks



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 2329

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

President Ford wrote:

That said, we must try to reach out to Daniel and Cindy, and whoever else might get caught up in the crossfire. These two people are courageous individuals who deserve to have their backs covered on this. Especially Cindy, who was burned by Les, Webster Tarpley and Kevin Barrett over the Kennebunkport Warning, which is a vital story for every Truth Activist to be up on because it shows who the fake truthers are, and who will probably be attending Les' event.

See here, here, and here


Agreed. In Cindy's case it is just possible Barrett apologize or smoothed things over "off stage" so to speak--if so it would be good to hear Cindy say so. If not, I expect Cindy is trying to be "above it all"--which is classy, but doesn't actually solve the problem of potential attacks from the same quarter in future.
_________________
___________________________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
truebeleaguer



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barrett wouldn't even apologize for coughing even if you were crushing his child's testicles in a vise.

Inability to apologize is the signature of the psychopath, in my experience.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really think we should get past this whole idea that Barrett would apologize and that an apology would somehow make up for years of bad behavior. The guy is a continuous liability to the movement. Good behavior doesn't excuse bad behavior. And a basic apology certainly doesn't.

At this point Barrett would have to write a book about his conversion in order for me to consider it even possible that he had changed his ways.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
victronix01



Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 1704

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barrett's one of the people for whom "evidence doesn't matter", which is why he's constantly promoting "no-Boeing-impact" at the Pentagon.

It's fascinating to me that people want to find truth but apparently don't care about actual evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
truthmover



Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.wedemandtransparency.com/

Total failure right on schedule.

First think you see when you get to the site if "Fuck" and the second and then the Obama Joker face.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
zombie bill hicks



Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 411
Location: West Virginia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup, I just decided to say fuck it and not go to NY this year. Oh well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    truthaction.org Forum Index -> News and Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group